The internet has vastly increased our access to information. To what extent do you think this is a good thing?
There is an increasingly popular idea that our information is approached significantly on using the internet. This situation has surely carried along with its both pros and cons, and I personally believe that the merits outweigh the demerits for several reasons.
This circumstance has its own strong points. The most obvious gain is that people using the Internet with their true information would manage their account easily. Let us take a case of Facebook account, there are two security steps in login in Facebook which are account's password and user's telephone number. This function helps people to protect their account from hackers who are trying to sign in other's Facebook account to steal information. Furthermore, if people register on websites with right information, there will be less fake accounts, which helps network security staff to reduce sharply complication in management.
However, we should not ignore the weak points of this situation, one of which is that there is a variety people who are beneficial from sale of real information. They would collect email addresses and telephone numbers by surfing in groups on Facebook; for example, a person uploads a post saying that he has a crucial material and appeals people to type their email addresses to receive it. It is such a good manner to gather information of others easily and fastly. Nevertheless, Internet users could avoid this loss of information by considering carefully before public their information.
In conclusion, after discuss all the points mentioned above, I think that circumstance is good when people using the Internet wisely.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-12 | pardeepkumar0492 | 89 | view |
| 2019-02-13 | furuuu | 78 | view |
| 2018-06-06 | Pham To Anh Dao | 61 | view |
| 2018-02-09 | n0air9x9 | 84 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of water use for different purposes in six areas of the world. 78
- The internet has vastly increased our access to information. To what extent do you think this is a good thing? 61
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 56
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, for example, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2972972973 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79594801867 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610038610039 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7264663212 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.333333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150347722992 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604616237301 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449493345184 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991333521612 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207348126547 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.