With internet improvements people can share views or opinions on certain goods or services that they have purchased Is this a good or a bad thing Discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

With internet improvements, people can share views or opinions on certain goods or services that they have purchased. Is this a good or a bad thing?

Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Nowadayas, broadening internet networks, in addition to social medias popularity cause individuals comment on almost every commodity which has been bought. This improvement has its advantages and disadvantages.

First breakthrough of this is that companies have to promote the quality of their products, and this would benefit majority of people. While in the past, people couldnot be aware of the quality of something they want to purchase unless someone in their family our friends had already bought that, today they can easily search on the internet and read previous customers' ideas from even other countries. As a result, firms know that in order to sell more goods, they have no choice except using high-quality materials and try producing compatible products.

Another privilege is that different opinions and ideas could help new users find a proper solution for their possible problems when they want to use a device they bought for the first time. Besides, some functions of devices are not come in the instruction book, so without reading others' comments, the person who owns the device would not be informed of those functions.

On the other hand, free access and ability to opine about everything results in some biased opinions, which could be given by opponent companies in order to diminish a company's sale rate. In addition, usually quality is a subjective notion. For instance, a mobile phone could seem suitable for someone because of appearance, while for another one the speed of internet is important. Therefore, some ideas might be misguiding.

In conclusion, I believe that view sharing about purchased goods and services is an improvement for human beings. This is because this process will eventually force producers to generate high-quality stuff, and also because it provides buyers the opportunity of using other customers' experiences.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-11 moeinynsi 73 view
Essays by user moeinynsi :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37162162162 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73182786639 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638513513514 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.016317761 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.307692308 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14115915201 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0448853885345 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492175785781 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0708516768826 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469718671356 0.056905535591 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.