Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charge.
To what extent is this a positive or negative development?
While in the past people used to choose and buy music albums and published books from stores, nowadays these things could be easily downloaded from the internet for free. Although this progress has some privileges, I believe that disadvantages outweigh advantages.
One of the benefits of the access to books and songs being eased is that today almost every kind of people are able to listen and read those special arts. In past, people had to spend money and purchase artworks they like, whereas today individuals with lower incomes can equally access to them, which is more fair. Likewise, singers and writers can simply deliver their works to people who are interested. Former writers and musicians, however, had to pass a great deal of difficulties to deliver their products to firms and companies which sponsored artists and decided what product has the capability of being published.
On the other hand, this comfortable process of publishing created works causes so many persons to think that they can be known as an artist as well. When a great number of individuals are uploading their works in social medias and websites so easy, others would be encouraged to try singing a song, or writing books, especially poems and minimal stories. As a result, today numerous tracks and e-books are on the internet, and most of them are horrific and superficial. In addition, the circumstances are becoming more and more complicated for real artists whose profession is singing or writing and want to make money of their efforts, since people are unwilling to pay for items when there are free ones.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that enhanced technology of downloading books and tracks without any payment is harmful, despite of the its advantages. This is because it makes finding an admirable and artful work hard due to redundant shallow productions available, and also prevents professional composers, singers, poets and writers from generating much money from their career.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-24 | cindycornelia98 | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | junjunh | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | junjunh | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | moeinynsi | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | Gowridevaraj | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people. 76
- In some countries the quality of life in larger cities is declining. Why do you think this is happening? What measures can be taken to stop it? 84
- More and more people are relying on the private car as their major means of transportation. Describe some of the problems overreliance on cars can cause, and suggest at least one possible solution. 84
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the past'?
Suggestion: In the past
... to listen and read those special arts. In past, people had to spend money and purchase...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 136, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'its'?
Suggestion: the; its
...hout any payment is harmful, despite of the its advantages. This is because it makes fi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, likewise, so, well, whereas, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13190184049 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65448042476 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613496932515 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.7134822549 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.416666667 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157965598275 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540724416078 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051760592513 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104602905131 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577897510587 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.