Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People have different views about the way to know about other countries’ culture. While some argue that it would be easy to learn about another country’s culture through the Internet, I believe that everyone should travel to the country to have a deep understanding of its culture and people.
There are various reasons why people believe one can know all about a country through the Internet. The first reason for this is the Internet has so much information that helps one learn about a country. Therefore, one can know a lot of things in a short period of time. Another reason is knowledge achieved by this way costs one nothing. For example, people who have low income have the opportunity to travel with a click of the mouse to search for information such as costumes, landscapes, or culture.
Nevertheless, I believe that people should travel by themselves to have their own experiences and memories. The main reason is that many aspects of culture can not be expressed by words or voices on the Internet. A good example in this case is cuisine. By traveling to a particular country, a traveler can enjoy how delicious the food in that place is. Furthermore, the feelings of how the food taste would definitely make unforgettable memories in travelers’ minds. In addition, the information about a country in the Internet may not be accurate and objective. This could be explained by the fact all the internet information is written by experienced traveler. As a result, the reviews coming from their own experience just show their views and may not be right.
In conclusion, while people can understand a country’s culture just through the Internet, I still believe that it is better to travel to a country because it brings not only experience, and memories but also deeper understanding.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | phamquoctrung2007 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
- Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...derstanding of its culture and people. There are various reasons why people bel...
^^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...one can know a lot of things in a short period of time. Another reason is knowledge achieved b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ories but also deeper understanding.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99671052632 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86956572706 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503289473684 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8901431144 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9375 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170198467854 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590984645847 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465822360853 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121281283641 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032409180368 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.