It is true that personal interviews are used by all employers and companies for selecting their staff. Others, however, argue that an interview is not a reliable method of choosing an employee; I personally agree with this opinion, there are better methods to select an ideal candidate.
On the one hand, people believe that an interview is one of the most important steps in the staff selection procedure, because it connects both the employers as well as job seekers. It assists employers in selecting the right person for the right job. It also helps job seekers to present their job skills and acquire a desired position on merit. In an interview, the interviewer can see and talk to the candidates, hence, he can make a correct decision, whether to select or reject the candidate. As a result, a personal interview is the most basic of selecting the right person for the right post.
On the other hand, I personally believe that personal job interview is an ineffective predictor because recruiters and hiring managers often judge candidates based on subjective, rather than job-related criteria. Thus, there are numerous alternative better methods in selecting a good candidate should be applied. First, recruiters should hold written job knowledge tests to see a candidate’s real abilities. Job knowledge tests allow employers to get a wider picture of a person’s role specific expertise. A job sample test is a great way for candidates to prove, beyond certainty, their ability to perform well on the job. In addition, another method is group discussion, which gives the candidates a chance to show their skills such as initiation, communication, and leadership; it also gives the employer an opportunity to assess and observe candidates' behaviour in action.
In conclusion, although interview forms play a vital role in a hiring process, I argue that job knowledge exams and group discussion are better methods in the selection of a right candidate.
- Interview forms are the basic selection criteria for the most large companies However some people think that interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods To what extent do you agree or disagree 59
- Plastic shopping bags are used widely and cause many environmental problems Some people say they should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- Towns and cities are attractive places Some suggest the government should spend money putting in more works of art like paintings and statues to make them better to live in Do you agree or disagree 95
- If a person is given a choice between life without work and working a lot he would prefer to have a life without work Do you agree or disagree 57
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 159, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... because it connects both the employers as well as job seekers. It assists employers in se...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 795, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...unication, and leadership; it also gives the employer an opportunity to assess an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92457261835 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51875 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4114277308 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.714285714 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254677289615 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981877693944 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700221589458 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184008507183 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689619618621 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.