Interviews form the basic selection criteria for most large. However, some people think that interviews is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other methods to what extent do you agree or disagree?
Indeed, it is truly considered that human resources is responsible for the success of any organisation. However, a group of people reckon that interview cannot guarantee to select the right candidate. While, other parameters can also be considered. So this essay shall analyse both the view points along with my opinion in the upcoming paragraph.
Apart from the interview, the other ways also be given significance for recruitment. The first point is that walk in drive is the better way to select the genuine employees. Not only this, recruitment by the international references is a best way because the existing employees give the best references of the new candidates. Further, by the health checkups it is ascertained the candidate is not suffering from any communicable disease and the background verification can also be done by the organisation to recruit the right personnel.
Interview is the best method criteria to choose the suitable candidate for the any top-notch company. The prime one is that, interviews are the prevalent practice which is starting from the yesteryear to hire the employees for the organisation so it can well consider by the corporate hubs. Furthermore, taking the directly selection saves the cost of the companies and it is just done by the word of mouth. Moreover, personal interaction is excellent way to check the overall personality of the candidates.
In my opinion, the role of other parameters is also very essential, as by the commercial methods the organisation can find the suitable candidate for their companies as well as job placement agencies are also providing the best work force to the companies.
Overall, it is true to say that both parameters is the right to select the right candidates for the any companies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he success of any organisation. However, a group of people reckon that interview ...
^^
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...uarantee to select the right candidate. While, other parameters can also be considere...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ment by the international references is a best way because the existing employees...
^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t, interviews are the prevalent practice which is starting from the yesteryear to...
^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s the organisation can find the suitable candidate for their companies as well as...
^^
Line 9, column 51, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t is true to say that both parameters is the right to select the right candidates...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, apart from, as well as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16262975779 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02679769597 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522491349481 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9085046013 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.571428571 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163231666487 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607228478936 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679039150104 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908526005374 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395328231018 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.