Is it better for children to learn to read by using the online material or by using printed material?
With the increase in the technology, there has been notable increase in the material that needed for the studies. Moreover, I am in agreement that it’s better to learn from the online material than that of the printed material.
Firstly, there seems no strong point for the disagreement that online material is not better than that of the printed material. As with the increase in the population, there has been increase in the number of the trees for the personal needs. While the printed material is indirectly obtaining by cutting the tree off. So indirectly nature is affected due to printed material while online material is ecofriendly. So in the rays of the conclusion this is one of the main reason for my view with that of the online agreement.
Secondly, the online material turns to friendly than that of the printed material. As the online material can fit in a small medium while that of the printed material needs lot of the space for its accommodation. Online material can be transfer to any part of the world with the short span of the time while that of the printed material needs time for its transversal. Exchange of the online material is cost free and rapidly while the printed material is cost expensive.
On conclusion, to wrap my discussion over this topic. I would like to say that I am in complete agreement that online material is far better than that of the printed material. As the online material are eco-friendly than that of the printed material. Nature is one of the important asset which could be converse with that of the online material.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-12-03 | Vaibhav1214 | 56 | view |
- Previous experience has shown that our stores are most profitable in areas where residents are highly concerned with leading healthy lives. We should therefore build our next new store in Plainsville, which has many such residents. Plainsville merchants r 66
- Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may be proven false in the future 50
- Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may be proven false in the future. 50
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries. 50
- In this age of intensive media coverage it is no longer possible for a society to regard any woman or man as a hero The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished quot 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 244, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...er of the trees for the personal needs. While the printed material is indirectly obta...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'needs'' or 'need's'?
Suggestion: needs'; need's
...dium while that of the printed material needs lot of the space for its accommodation....
^^^^^
Line 4, column 176, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tter than that of the printed material. As the online material are eco-friendly th...
^^
Line 4, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... printed material. Nature is one of the important asset which could be converse ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79197080292 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61880070032 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 176.041082164 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.397810218978 0.561755894193 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.1233401884 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.5333333333 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53333333333 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418389540528 0.244688304435 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184712308619 0.084324248473 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0983216315036 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.299997910859 0.151304729494 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05326501078 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.83 8.58950901804 80% => Dale chall readability score is low.
difficult_words: 40.0 78.4519038076 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.