It is better for college students to live far away from home than live at home with their parents. Do you agree or disagree?
It is better for college students to live far away from home than live at home with their parents. Do you agree or disagree?
It is true that plenty of students will live far from home as they continue higher-education. However, some students still live with their parents. This questioned an argument that whether living far from home or staying with parents is better.
On the one hand, living independently is completely terrific for students because it makes them tackle with various issues in their lives that they might never think of before. Firstly, students would have to learn to balance their finance, which is the most vital thing to help them survive until the end of the month. In fact, they must allocate a certain amount of their money properly on hundreds of expenses, such as accommodation expense, foodstuff expense… Secondly, they would have chances to build interpersonal relationships when living without parents. These social relationships could benefit students in their career later as well as teach them the way to communicate and take care of the surroundings.
On the other hand, saving-money and safety are main reasons for others to live with their parents. Firstly, living together can reduce the burden on their budget monthly due to the share of different things between members in a family. For example, if a father and a son travel to work and school by the only vehicle, they can save a large amount of money to buy another means of transport. Besides, students living with their parents could avoid exposure to unclear and toxic relationships better than those living far family. As a result, they can have a healthy lifestyle and spend more time to do the domestic chores and care of their parents.
In conclusion, although students can take a variety of advantages when living with parents, I agree that it should be better for them to stay away from home and experience many challenges that they have never met before.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-19 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-03 | vaimikpatel2908@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2020-09-08 | nirav24 | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-01 | phg_phg | 73 | view |
- Space travel has been possible for some time and some people believe that space tourism could be developed in the future Do you think it is a positive or negative development 63
- Some people say that it is possible for a country to be both economically successful and have a clean environment Others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 86
- Solving environmental problems should be the responsibility of an international organizational rather than each national government Do you agree or disagree 63
- Some people think a job not only provides income but also social life.Others think it is better to develop social life with people you do not work with. Discuss both views. 78
- In schools and universities girls tend to choose arts while boys like science What are the reasons for this trend and do you think this tendency should be changed 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 637, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... benefit students in their career later as well as teach them the way to communica...
^^
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lenges that they have never met before.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94259818731 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62825641174 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531722054381 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5684162892 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.066666667 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5333333333 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.586392067916 0.244688304435 240% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.225916740911 0.084324248473 268% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.196181886299 0.0667982634062 294% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.442223294221 0.151304729494 292% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.292736063553 0.056905535591 514% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.