It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music and other not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The author of the issue contends that there is a belief that babies are born with specific talents from their infancy, while some others claim that humankind is teachable and their talent will be thrived by means of education. From my point of view, the human being is the combination of effort and inborn intelligence since there are myriad factors that should be taken into account. In what follows, my opinion will be delineated and other aspects will be cited.
The group which believes that kids can be taught to become a prosperous athlete or musician states that since human muscles could be trained via special bodybuilding procedures at clubs, the brain as the headquarter of the body with billions of neurons inside will become much stronger with diverse brain training programs, for instance , solving mathematical problems, solving Sudoko , etc. moreover, their assumption is that some talents are receptive and no gender has not born with definite ability to lead them doing things automatically. What is more is that this group believes that not only training is crucial but also there are lots of characteristic facets that are involved like self-esteem, endeavor, lifestyle, etc.
On the other hand, some believe that children are born with particular aptitude. As long as, infants born intact the talents should be discovered and foster. This hypothesis looks beyond the nature of human beings. Additionally, this claim considers the genes and DNA that astute kids inherit cleverness and sharpness from their ancestors which will affect the structure of the brain and total body shape. Also, they remark that the kid goes through their abilities instinctively and there is a pre-written method that calls them to follow the way and utilize their natural-born powers.
To sum up, although some people believe that kids born with innate talents, the second group assumes that children must be under a train to revitalize their talents. In my opinion, there are thousands of clever children all around with an abundant source of intelligence, as they are not functionally trained, their talent demised inside and never find permission to become public. Firstly I believe that abilities must be measured under special circumstances and guided to the right path.
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music and other not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician. Discuss both these views and 78
- It is important for children to learn the differences between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion.What sort of punishment should parents and 73
- Some think that it is better to get information or advice from other people, while others believe one can get any information or advice from the internet or books. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...lding procedures at clubs, the brain as the headquarter of the body with billions of neurons in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...se brain training programs, for instance , solving mathematical problems, solving ...
^^
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ng mathematical problems, solving Sudoko , etc. moreover, their assumption is that...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, second, so, while, for instance, in my opinion, to sum up, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1927.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25068119891 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64364220139 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569482288828 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.9805730892 49.4020404114 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.642857143 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2142857143 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78571428571 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209174801864 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715691456439 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560899013365 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127463409181 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261713138862 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.