Some think that it is better to get information or advice from other people, while others believe one can get any information or advice from the internet or books. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The author of the issue contends that data or any recommendation should be given from other people surrounded. On the other hand, some believe that publications and the internet are a convenient way to convey information and a suitable tool to consult with. From my point of view, everybody who wants to get concrete information and data should consider personal experiences and academic knowledge. In what follows, the reasons posited by both groups will be delineated and my opinion will be cited.
The group which believes that any information must be caught from other people states that humankind is a socialized creature which always has question mark in their mind, so that they should be trained and get the necessary data from others to shed light on dark side of their mind to discover new way to reach to their responses. Moreover, this group thinks that practical experiences are the result of a humankind long life and no book will be able to substitute people`s knowledge.
Despite the fact that there is another group that believes academic information be gotten by mining the books and internet to give respective guidance. This group states that human questions answer is in the depth of the books which were written by distinguished scientists which specialized expertise in each segment of science. Not only authentic data will conduct the people to the right path but also it leads their mindset to a more logical and reasonable answer. Also they remark that every individual have its own experiences which were under their own circumstances, nevertheless, internet is the explosion of data which billions of people share their experiences and thousands of credible articles are reachable online, so that people will be able to consult and surf the internet in a wide range of source all around the globe.
To sum up, although some people believe that information should be given through other people, the second group thinks that the information must be achieved by means of publications and the world wide web. In my opinion, there are lots of facets to rely on human experience or written books in the library. Actually, consulters should take the aspects and field of questions into account, so that they will be able to decide which source of information is accredited.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-03 | Kinzen | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | Mr.Strange | 73 | view |
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music and other not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician. Discuss both these views and 78
- Some think that it is better to get information or advice from other people, while others believe one can get any information or advice from the internet or books. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- It is important for children to learn the differences between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion.What sort of punishment should parents and 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 470, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...o a more logical and reasonable answer. Also they remark that every individual have ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, then, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 7.30460921844 301% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1954.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11518324607 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74812385072 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494764397906 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.6544311534 49.4020404114 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.307692308 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3846153846 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214215130735 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853198119773 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693903473454 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153386108479 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633644978972 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.