It has been said that reading for pleasure is better in developing imagination and language skills than watching TV. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Reading for our satisfaction is proven to be more effective for development of our imagination and reading skills than watching television. I completely agree with this statement as reading books improves a person’s range of vocabulary and sharpens mind whereas watching visuals gives us less chance to imagine things.
First of all, every book contains different sentence structures, grammatical sentences along with wide range of vocabularies and complex words. This is an important step towards improving our language skills since we try to interpret and learn every sentences and words repeatedly which is not possible while watching television. Furthermore, while reading a book, we tend to visualize and make up the contents within our mind. Eventually, we sharpen our imagination skills and help ourselves learn and spell different types of words while reading.
Secondly, watching a television gives us less opportunity to imagine as well as interpret the languages and words spoken. In other word, a television shows visuals of the entire story and characters along with sound effects which ultimately make us entertained leaving no chance of imagination for us. In addition, television shows are continuously and timely broadcasted which we can’t even control or re-watch as per our need. Thus, it is almost impossible for us to re-watch or re-read for our better understanding just as reading a book. Although, a television shows visuals along with audio, we can’t have much better result from this as compared to reading books.
In conclusion, I believe reading is more better than watching television to improve our language and imagination skills. It restricts us from graphics and sounds which forces our mind to make up things together as well as to read repeatedly in order to learn wide range of vocabluaries and complex senetences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 37, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
... In conclusion, I believe reading is more better than watching television to improve our...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, whereas, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40614334471 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97507966661 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522184300341 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8441712268 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.846153846 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2307692308 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217323494889 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960968301788 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835403871488 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158071507024 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673808101469 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.