Government should spend more money on railways rather than roads.
To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that railways need to be more prioritized in terms of development rather that roads. I totally agree with this statement because trains are faster and more environment friendly.
Investing extra funds for the extension for railways contributes a lot in terms of saving time and money of the public. This is because a single train can commute enormous amount of people and good in a short period of time. Therefore, people will spend less time on transportation and focus more on doing productive work for themselves and well as the society. For instance, the British government spends 80% of its infrastructure funds on maintain their country railways so that people wont have to face longer waiting hours for commuting.
Similarly, trains are proven to be less harmful to the environment when compared with the cars. Trains today uses fewer internal combustion engines thus reducing the potential of carbon emission. In terms of cars which emits pollution and toxic gases, train seems more productive and deserves to be developed to a greater extent. For example, 50 countries are participating in the program organized by the UN in order to open underground metro service which will cut the usage of cars and bikes.
In conclusion, a nation should divert funds towards railway construction as much as possible and specialize less on roads as this aids a country to improve commuting time and achieve a healthy environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...us amount of people and good in a short period of time. Therefore, people will spend less time...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 32, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng. Similarly, trains are proven to be less harmful to the environment when ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, similarly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1226.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 237.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17299578059 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80619585457 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616033755274 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0928554547 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.454545455 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.54545454545 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148952014462 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542954620761 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523257507728 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0914158400323 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618052132984 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.