It has been said that the world is becoming a global village in which there are no boundaries to trade and communication. Do the benefits of globalisation outweigh the drawbacks?
There is no doubt that the globalization a sources of constant debate. While some people assume that phenomenon would be appealing for the development of worldwide economy by eradicating the national boundaries, the others suppose that it can contain adverse corollary. From my perspective, I am convinced that the potential benefit seems far to outweigh the cost.
First of all, it is worth noting that the eliminating of frontier leading to the excessive proliferation of industries over the world with the increasing of goods producing. As a consequence, more and more untreated chemicals dump into the environment causing the pollutions which represent a deadly threaten to habitat there. Furthermore, globalization has driven to the unemployment and exploitation when increasing the completion of those companies in the same fields that can result in closures, offshoring within the job losses is instructive corollary in these nations. Moreover, the global homogenization can pose a danger to national and cultural identity. The most feasible case is the Asian tendency of adapting the Western lifestyle is spread widely by the Hollywood films.
However, the positive outcomes have been inevitable by boosting the growth of economy. As for the flows of trading products between countries, it would be more fluent without the deterrents of customs department and drive to the higher GDP to nations. Besides that, residents deem have more chance to expose to various cultures within a deeper understanding of foreign values and attitudes via globalization as the result is the diversity of cultures in one countries. Additionally, the thriving worldwide economy creates opportunities for employment and help reducing the poverty in developing countries. Finally, that can strengthen political relationships by enhancing the co-operations between these nations companies.
As above all reasons, I strongly believed that globalization would bring back both advantaged and disadvantaged effects to society. However the merits incline to be predominant the opposite
- people nowadays spend less time with their families what are the reasons and effects of that 81
- Some people believe the aim of university education is to help graduates get better jobs Others believe there are much wider benefits of university education for both individuals and society Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The table shows data about what people in the UK thought the government should increase spending on 70
- It has been said that the world is becoming a global village in which there are no boundaries to trade and communication Do the benefits of globalisation outweigh the drawbacks 84
- In many countries fast food is becoming cheaper and more available Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a source' or simply 'sources'?
Suggestion: a source; sources
...here is no doubt that the globalization a sources of constant debate. While some people a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one country', 'a country', or simply 'countries'?
Suggestion: one country; a country; countries
... result is the diversity of cultures in one countries. Additionally, the thriving worldwide e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 560, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to reduce' or 'reduce'.
Suggestion: to reduce; reduce
...s opportunities for employment and help reducing the poverty in developing countries. Fi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 132, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...d and disadvantaged effects to society. However the merits incline to be predominant th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, while, as for, no doubt, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65916398714 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20881634108 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627009646302 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5859019602 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.333333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101856892079 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.031307404231 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0318468678974 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0550897086508 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228227194734 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.