Opinions diverge on whether infants must learn the distinction between right and wrong through punishment. Although some formidably censure this sentiment, I am in opposition and ascertain that this point of view should be more encouraged by a handful of punishments.
THROUGH punishment, I admit that children are shown the consequence of what they did. This can be explained by the fact that children are able to aware that they have to exchange multiple valuable things with what they have caused. This leads to their hesitation in repeating their poor behaviors and vaguely they cease to make these mistakes. Further and even more prominently, based on a wonderful memory of infants, their parents can use words or physical impact to warn them of danger and they will remember. Likewise, my dad teaches his child to always apologize for what his son does; if I bang my head on the table, I have to apologize to the table even though I am crying.
It is perceptible that school punishment and home punishment are able to be applied to educate children. The reason is that teachers can assign numerous exercises or coerce children into writing their mistakes repeatedly in a public way; and if they still oppose, they have to get suspended from school. This leads to the fact that individuals who are fined will get shy and thereafter modify behaviors more appropriate to integrate into the community. Moreover, punishment by a familiar person is even worse. Take the stigma of a relative person as an exemplary model. Children when they make mistakes and get observations from their family, they will hesitate in making wrongdoings.
In conclusion, I firmly chastise the way of applying negative punishment, the aforementioned measures represent a better perspective and are more effective for children.
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The diagram illustrates how bees produce honey Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The table below shows a survey on the preference of different age groups in a European country on different TV programmes in 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart below shows the percentages of males and females with higher education qualifications in 5 countries in 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment and not enough time on more serious duties and obligations 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a public way" with adverb for "public"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... into writing their mistakes repeatedly in a public way; and if they still oppose, they have to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, moreover, so, still, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09427609428 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83340485374 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579124579125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.049048134 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.071428571 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198177547326 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685174760988 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489351267767 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114726043157 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057978304607 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.