It is inevitable that as technology advances, traditional cultures will be lost. It seems that we cannot have these two things together.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the recent times enormous growth in technology and media is evident. It is feared that local customs and cultural values would suffer as a result of technological developments. I believe traditions and cultures are not at stake as technology expands, rather both can establish and cherish together.
It is argued that, social media has brought the world closer but it has also destroyed conventional methods of socialization. For instance, facebook, one of the major social networking portal has made it possible to stay in contact with friends abroad. However, people are less aware of their immediate surroundings and the events taking place in the community. Another negative impact that technology development has ensured, the younger generation are more interested in internet or television information which is usually not related to their local customs. To illustrate, youth are well informed regarding show biz or distant countries, nevertheless, the lack serious information regarding their own geography, nation's history.
On the other hand, certain countries has used technological development to their benefits. They have used networking platforms to popularize and nurture their culture. For example China has launched a number of television programs to familiarize their upcoming generations about their history and cultural values. Furthermore, India has utilized social media by showing their religious rituals and annual ceremonies to enhance Indian cultural. Subsequently, tourism in India has risen by 25% in last 10 years. As a result even western population visit India on various religious festivals.
All in all, technology might have overshadowed some of the old traditional customs in some parts of the world. However, I agree to fact that by appropriate scheming and e
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 511, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ndia has risen by 25% in last 10 years. As a result even western population visit ...
^^
Line 13, column 48, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...all, technology might have overshadowed some of the old traditional customs in some parts o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, nevertheless, regarding, so, well, for example, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61678832117 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0325392696 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642335766423 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2377811335 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1875 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0957575958913 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0314741472391 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371942963782 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0708559740463 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511146605316 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.