Although the government in almost every nation contributes the immense efforts in protecting the old buildings because of the historical aspects, there are several citizens suggest that the authority should reconstruct the old buildings to make room for newer areas. Personally, the preservation of historical places are important, however, historical should not be the obstacle of development. In this essay, information and evidence are given to clarify my point of views.
Firstly, the importance of maintaining old buildings should be recognized carefully, but the need for constructing new places for citizens should receive more attention from authority. In detail, on the one hand, because of the importance of teaching younger generation about historical moments, old buildings present as the visible evidence. For example, although being destroyed dramatically in the World War II, Sanna Shrine gate still receives protection from Japanese authority until now, as the government wants to warn citizens about the effects of wars. However, the safety and expenses to preserver old buildings have to be taken into consideration to guarantee the historical values will not become the burden to our society.
Secondly, due to the overpopulation, the demand for houses and working areas keeps growing intensively. As a result, constructing new places for inhabitants has a likelihood of becoming an inevitable tendency. Obviously, the land fund is limited, therefore, the deconstruction old buildings to create the newer ones is unquestionable. Consequently, although preservation of historical places is highly prioritized in majority of countries, the development of industrialization and modernization are more important. For example, several years ago in Vietnam, because of the beauty and historical meaning of the old bridge called “Long Bien” in Hanoi city, most people voted to keep it instead of replacing by a new one. Eventually, as the small size of the old bridge could not afford the huge number of vehicle, people normally suffered from traffic jam when driving through this place.
To conclude, I believe the old constructions play a crucial role in our life, however the preservation of these historical evidence should be conducted efficiently to avoid conflicting with the human needs.
- Topic: Fossil fuels (coal, oil, natural gas) are the main sources in many countries, but in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy (wind energy and solar energy) are encouraged. To what extent do you think it is a positive or negative dev 89
- Sending criminals to prison is not the best method of dealing with them. Education and job training are the best ways to help them. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Today, the majority of children are raised by their grandparents due to the fact that their parents are busy working. To what extent do you think it affects the whole family? 78
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 73
- Some cities have few control over design and construction on housing and office buildings People think that they are free to choose the design they like Do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages 96
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1969.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62571428571 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20258696452 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.6958215885 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.642857143 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373522988035 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12008383235 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0977361498448 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21719076174 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0847336565008 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.