It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In this contemporary world, everybody relying on technology, that is developed in various fields or sectors. However, due to the development in technology, traditional values and cultures are declining and it makes sense that technology and tradition are not harmonious. I strongly agree with the above statement and further, I will explain it in a more detailed way.
To commence with, Respecting and taking care of animals is one of the traditional cultures which is getting ruined with the enhancement of technology. In the past, people will treat cows, chickens, and other livestock with respect, affection, and also given the status of god as they will give edible products to humans. Nowadays, people are treating them harshly to get more productivity from them by using machines and artificial methods. For example, Sophisticated machines are using to extract milk from cows and other milk-give animals. Consequently, causing a lot of pain to livestock to fulfill our requirements.
Another point is that people's attitudes and way of behaving with others are changed drastically. Nowadays, Even though children know the value of their parents and grandparents, they are not showing respect towards them. If elder people try to teach their offspring about their cultural traditions, they are just treating them as old-fashioned people and think that they only know about what is the world by just having knowledge on how to utilize smartphones. For instance, consider that a child is spending too much time on their mobile phones by chatting then their parents will address them about the effects of not engaging with their family members. But, that child will not able to realize the importance of his/her family.
In conclusion, Traditional values are degrading by the improvements in technology in various ways. If people are able to access the required technology within limits by maintaining their traditions then it would add more beauty to the lives of humans.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-07 | dorae | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | dorae | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-26 | thuyan1211 | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-09 | tranvuongphuongmy | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | Emma1998 | 84 | view |
- Write about the following topic Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant exa 73
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and 84
- The charts shows air pollution levels by different causes among four countries in 2021 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ovements in technology in various ways. If people are able to access the required ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2753164557 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86798090175 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572784810127 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8520530931 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.133333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208817844468 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703395035961 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614779656382 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140428069433 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611883406339 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.