It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and
traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
Some people hold the view that technological advancements will lead to the loss of traditional values. In my opinion, whereas this situation might be true in some parts of society, others are promoted by its development.
On the one hand, it is irrefutable that various technological breakthroughs have considerably altered the way people live and behave. Firstly, in earlier times, youngsters, husbands- and wives-to-be or older generation had to rely on photographers to pose for their photos. These days, nevertheless, with rapid progress in smartphone engineering, many would prefer to take photos on their own instead of going to a studio. Secondly, it is clear that members of a family used to spend leisure time together with each other. However, nowadays, the Internet is considered as a means of relaxation and recreation to many people. Consequently, a majority of people living in urban areas even do not know their closest neighbors.
On the other hand, different traditions benefit from the development of technology. To embark on, many farmers in the countryside, with improvement in weather forecast system, are better informed of upcoming weather conditions; therefore, crops will be more well-protected compared to the past. Furthermore, with the prevalence of the Internet, local authorities can advertise and popularize their region's many breathtaking destinations as well as historical sites on social media. Accordingly, not only do people acquire more knowledge about their national values but more and more visitors are also attracted to the country.
By way of conclusion, although it is undeniable advances in technology have superseded some traditional lifestyles, I still believe that many traditions are better preserved and fostered with the aid of technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-07 | dorae | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | dorae | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-26 | thuyan1211 | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-09 | tranvuongphuongmy | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | Emma1998 | 84 | view |
- The maps below show recent changes in the town of Kimsville Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 78
- Writing task 2 You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic Trying to save endangered animal species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any r 89
- The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple producing countries in 2009 and 2019 and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 78
- WRITING TASK 2 You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic The Internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades Although some of these changes have been negative the overall effect of this technology 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, whereas, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21855365084 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647272727273 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7384076668 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.769230769 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.8461538462 7.06120827912 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190086515643 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629810240285 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617354277289 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125243701149 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473091319083 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.