It is justified that government money should be spent on arts. Others believe that governments should focus on health care and education. Discuss both views and give your opinion
The idea that whether the authorities should allocate money on arts or health care and education remains a source of controversy. While I believe that the works of arts are worth investigation, other aspects including health and education cannot be overlooked.
On the one hand, although maintaining art galleries and historical buildings costs a large amount of money, the state should not put an end to these institutions. The reason is that the collection of arts preserves the cultural identity of a certain country. If there were no places such as museums or historical destinations, it would be hard for the young generation to experience the feeling of awe and pride in their countries. Despite the advance in technology, youngsters could easily access whatever they want to observe through the internet, nothing can replace the sense of seeing real artifacts in person. Take the Art Museum in London as an example. Every year, hundreds of visitors come here just to observe the skeleton of dinosaurs which people cannot get a sense of amazing when seeing via a computer screen.
On the other hand, I would argue that health and education are more essential to human-beings. In terms of well-being, the state should spend money on preventative medicine instead of treatment. This is simply because the national budgets spent on illness prevention is less than treatment. When citizens are conscious that some chronic diseases like cardiovascular disease, obesity, diabetes could be prevented by simply changing their lifestyle, the number of people suffering from these diseases would reduce tremendously. Regarding education, the development of a nation depends significantly on knowledgeable residents. The government should not underestimate the importance of tertiary education.
In conclusion, while other people advocate that money should be allocated to arts, it seems to me that health and education are more crucial to invest in for all above-mentioned reasons.
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 Summerize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- There is a widespread saying that books and novels spur the imagination and language skills much more than any TV programme I believe that this notion holds true no matter what modern technologies are used on TV and TV media production The reasons are sim 84
- The line graph illustrates the amount of money which is received by rice exports from Thailand and Vietnam during the period from 2012 to 2015 It is evident that the prices of rice exports decreased tremendously from 2012 to 2015 Meanwhile the cost remain 78
- Although it is believed that pleasure reading is a better way to improve imagination and linguistic skills I think that learning through watching TV is as effective as reading Of course reading for pleasure brings benefits to the readers When reading the 73
- The table illustrates how much money was donated to developing countries in the period 2006 2010 by US and EU charities to support technological development Overall it is clear that total aid increased during this period US aid was considerably higher tha 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, regarding, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39032258065 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03864290044 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609677419355 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3310810297 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.4 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275489461724 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856391481193 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805451042093 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178194183143 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837259312529 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.