The bar chart shows mobile usage in a country by age group from 1998 to 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrates the percentage of people using mobile in a nation by different age groups during the period from 1998 to 2000.
Overall, it is evident that the number of citizens aged 16 to 30 was the highest over the given period. Besides, this age group saw a downward trend in the proportion of mobile usage.
Starting at 53%, the statistics of 16-30 year-old people using mobile decreased tremendously to 44% in 2000. Meanwhile, the figure for mobile usage by people aged 31-50 took the second-largest percentage with 41% in the initial year. There was a minimal fall in the number of people aged 31-50 using mobile to 37% in the final year.
In contrast, the data on mobile usage of the remaining groups was much lower. People who are less than 15-year-old experienced an upward trend from 2% in 1998 to 9% in 200. Similarly, there was a small rise in the percentage of people aged more than 50. This proportion stood at 4% in the first year, growing up to 10% at the end of the stage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-26 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | syema | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | tata | view | |
| 2023-02-21 | nvtrung309 | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-23 | kevann | 73 | view |
- The line graph illustrates the amount of money which is received by rice exports from Thailand and Vietnam during the period from 2012 to 2015 It is evident that the prices of rice exports decreased tremendously from 2012 to 2015 Meanwhile the cost remain 78
- To succeed in a business one needs to know maths To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- It is said that raising the cost of air tickets would reduce the number of people traveling by planes because of damaging issues for the environment While I partly agree with this tendency I strongly believe that other measures would be more effective On 61
- The bar charts compare how many people in urban and rural areas were affected by noise pollution from four sources during daytime and nightime in 2007 Overall it is clear that more people in cities experienced all types of noise pollution compared with ru 67
- It is obvious that nowadays there is an increasing number of people purchasing well known designer labels of consumer products While this trend can account for some primary reasons I strongly believe that this is a negative tendency There are two principa 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, second, similarly, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 823.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54696132597 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5241545487 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558011049724 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.6053755673 43.030603864 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.3 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182619530683 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827012131289 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633488511678 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134959133823 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600084233702 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.81 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.