It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaur, dodo…) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, a myriad of endangered animals are on the verge of extinction, it, therefore, leads to numerous repercussions. Some people believe that this disappearance is inevitable and people do not have any reason to deal with this problem. I, personally, contradict this premise because a part of the rare animals’ extinction is human-induced.
To begin with, it is believed that endangered animals are more likely to no longer exist in the next few years, which is a natural process and humans are not responsible for meddling in the extinction. First of all, these are long-standing animals and some of them can not adapt to the sudden change of temperature. For instance, dinosaurs had a large number of individuals in the past when the eruptions occurred which lasted for thousands of years. Temperatures would have dropped, plants would have been unable to grow, and food would have become scarce. Owing to this drastic change, dinosaurs could not acclimate and found food sources immediately; they, therefore, became wiped out. Besides, it is conspicuous that humanity would not be able to stop these disappearances. Nevertheless, this was only true in the past, not now, inasmuch as endangered creatures may now be saved, even if only in small part, by humans.
On the other hand, rare animals are a treasure trove of various aspects in life and protecting them is human’s responsibility. Firstly, these animals do a favor for biological diversity with a wide range of types of animals which provide valuable medicinal herbs, maintain biological balance. Therefore, they should be protected and preserved. Additionally, pushing animals to the brink of extinction is also partly due to human impacts such as hunting and habitat degradation, so humans have a duty to safeguard these organisms. With modern technology, humans are able to crossbreed to remain the number of endangered animals such as do do, quokka. In the interim, people are about to protect the environment as well as prohibit hunting rare creatures.
To sum up, animals play a pivotal role in human’s life; as a result, organizations should collaborate to conserve and maintain their variety.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-27 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-12 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | Kien Vu | 84 | view |
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 78
- School should not force children to learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 78
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011 The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one person households 89
- The graph below shows the percentages of tourists who used different types of transport to travel within a particular nation between 1989 and 2009 Each tourist may have used more than one type of transport Summarise the information by selecting and report 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...emperature. For instance, dinosaurs had a large number of individuals in the past when the erupti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 637, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: do
...he number of endangered animals such as do do, quokka. In the interim, people are abo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19774011299 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01556285465 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576271186441 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4665727434 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.235294118 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8235294118 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5882352941 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198944394663 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607257449329 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415581841142 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118147033292 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461219690583 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.