The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009.
Given is the bar chart depicting five distinct reasons why Americans travel, while the pie chart delineates six prime problems related to traveling in the public in the year 2009.
It is conspicuous that commuting to and from work was the principal reason for travel in the US and the most concerning issue was the cost of taking trips.
When it comes to the bar chart, nearly half of American passengers opted to travel regarding their employment. Additionally, this percentage was so far higher than the figures for journeys with shopping and personal purposes, at 16% and 19% respectively. Meanwhile, only one-tenth of trips in total were contributed to social and recreation reasons. Perceptibly, visiting friends or relatives took the bottom purposes for traveling with 6%.
Turning to the pie chart, 36% of American travelers worried about the price of making journeys which were close to twofold higher than safety concerns. Moreover, the third and four primary traveling problems belonged to aggressive drivers and highway traffic jams with 17% and 14% respectively. By contrast, only 8% of passengers made anxious about access to public transport. Eventually, the least proportion of traveling issues was space for pedestrians with 6% in the US.
- The graph below gives information about the sales of the three most commonly purchased items in a particular bakery for the year 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 51
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Although more and more people read news on the Internet newspapers will remain the most important source of news Do you agree or disagree 78
- The maps below show the changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2015 and present day 84
- The below compared 2 floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, regarding, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28855721393 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82091745848 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651741293532 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9837458719 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.3 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386191021306 0.215688989381 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139078581038 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100561389887 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236984997292 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388089912946 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.