It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaur, dodo…) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
For some people, extinction is regarded as a natural progression in the development of fauna; thus there is no need for humans to deter this from occurring in real life. From my perspective, I genuinely disagree with this assumption. Analyzing the benefits of endangered animal species in terms of material for scientific research and production would provide valid support for my verdict.
Initially, it is tangible that, for years, scientists have utilized and taken inspiration for new inventions from animals on the verge of extinction. Take Jonathan the Tortoise, as an illustration, which is the oldest living creature still existing on Earth. It originated from an extinct branch of an ancient tortoise; therefore there are various precious ADN in its body which is valuable for scientific research, for instance how to improve people’s longevity. Consequently, channeling effort into preserving these endangered animal species can contribute to advantageous experimental results for humans’ life. As most individuals can take advantage of these findings, protecting fauna on the verge of extinction should be responsible for humans.
The other justification behind the need to protect endangered fauna refers to the fact that they are indispensable materials for certain sectors of manufacturing. For example, Parada, a fashion brand that is well-known for luxurious coats made of fox fur, has made millions of dollars because these coats are extremely convenient, light, yet still warm. Tangibly, protecting and consciously moderating exploiting these on-the-brink-of-extinction foxes would be beneficial not only for the corporation but also for the sake of customers. Thus, this makes it clear that the more action human beings take against the extinction of animal species, the more benefit they will attain.
In conclusion, as for the aforementioned explanations of endangered animal species being scientific and manufacturing materials, I hold a strong belief that people should be in charge of the extinction of these species. From now on, human beings should put more strict laws into practice and eliminate lenient regulations in terms of protecting fauna on the brink of extinction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-27 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-12 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | Kien Vu | 84 | view |
- People now have the freedom to work and live anywhere in the world due to the development of communication technology and transportation Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Some people think that printed books are not necessary for the digital era because all writing can be stored electronically Others think printed books still play an important role Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Influence of human beings on the world s ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio diversity What are the primary causes of loss of bio diversity What solutions can you suggest 84
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Many people say that cooking and eating healthily is better for individuals health than consuming ready meals To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62089552239 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27813116079 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594029850746 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9876456824 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.5 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9285714286 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221596805937 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839241670974 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460625897473 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149921716857 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467013193197 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.