It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.). There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?
Regarding the issue of animal extinction, some people hold the view that the tendency is a natural procedure; therefore, individuals should not intervene in it. However, from my perspective, I believe that people should hold the major responsibility to stop animals from dying out.
Evidently, humans are the underlying reason that pushes animals on the brink of extinction. Unlike the retrospect when animals namely dinosaurs and dodos were wiped out because of natural catastrophes like meteors’ crash down, environmental contamination is now the main justification leading to creatures’ extinction. To be more specific, water pollution and climate change has caused the natural habitats to change, making numerous faunas unable to adapt and survive. In fact, a plethora of marine species have consumed indigestible chemicals and components due to oil leakage and untreated sewage disposed into water resources. Moreover, poaching is also a contributory factor causing animals’ elimination. There is a fallacy that animals’ parts such as hones and bones can be used as medical treatment; as a consequence, some animals like rhinos have become the target of illegal hunters.
It is beyond doubt that the disappearance of animals can have devastating impacts on individuals’ lives. Undoubtedly, should certain creatures die out, the food chain will be affected significantly. In fact, there is an interdependence between humans and fauna as people used commodities and food made from animals; therefore, without them, it is challenging for the mankind to meet the increasing demand. Additionally, maintaining the ecology balance is vital since it ensures the stability of organisms and the environment. For instance, because of deforestation, there are no more trees preventing water runoffs, which leads to flood in many regions.
In conclusion, I am inclined that individuals are responsible for animals’ extinction; hence they should intervene in the tendency.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-21 | sangeeth28 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-23 | sangeeth28 | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-30 | Mphthao | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-24 | leanguyen | 89 | view |
- Some believe that people are naturally born as leaders while others feel that leadership skills can develop Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- the procedure for university entry for high school graduates 78
- Leadership 11
- environmental pollution 89
- table depicts the rate of people located in different regions 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67003367003 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23499819169 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8593451815 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.285714286 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213044860596 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647627687401 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393206796042 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124994037137 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292672312241 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.