students giving good ratings
The given table depicts the proportion of learners giving positive feedback on 5 different categories of a particular university.
Overall, it is clearly seen that while print resources received the most good ratings, students mostly did not satisfy with the range of modules offered.
A closer look at the statistics reveals that print resources witnessed little changes in the satisfaction levels with the range from 87 to 89 percent over the surveyed period, remaining its highest position. It is striking that from the initial figure of only 45 percent, the rate of students enjoying the electronic resources rocketed to 88 percent. Likewise, there was a marginal rise by 4 percent in the percentage of learners who satisfied with the teaching quality of a university.
Turning to buildings and teaching facilities, the proportion of learners giving good ratings stayed stable at 77 percent. It is noticeable that in 2000 the range of modules offered received the least good evaluation and in the subsequent decade, the figure followed a downward trend, ending the surveyed period the last place.
- Many students find it difficult to focus or pay attention at school nowadays What are the reasons for this What can be done to solve this problem 84
- In many countries the number of animals and plants is declining Why do you think this is happening How can this issue be solved 84
- Some believe children should be taught to give speeches and presentations in school Why is this Should this be taught in schools 65
- the procedure for university entry for high school graduates 78
- As well as making money businesses also have a responsibility towards society To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28409090909 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80419457802 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613636363636 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7432809746 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.857142857 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233123347074 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987065773702 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879934556559 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126297674636 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603837313621 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.