Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is appreciated that studying with a student group at school is far more advantageous than online learning from home. From my perspective, I genuinely agree with this opinion. This essay would provide valid justifications for my verdict.
Initially, I opine that studying with a group of students at school surpasses learning online at home regarding students' health. This is mainly derived from the fact that in order to attend online classes, frequent and intensive exposure to electronic devices such as smartphones or computers is required. Consequently, students might suffer from being short-sighted, or even episodic blindness as for the harmfulness of blue light from digital devices. Also, online studying means no direct interactions, which can badly affect the friendship between students and their mental state. According to recent research by the Ministry of Education and Training in Vietnam, almost 85% of online learners feel fatigued and hard to make friends while offline learners comprise only 16%. Should students could have learning experiences in the area of educational institutions, these physical and mental problems might be curbed.
Moreover, I hold a strong belief that studying with a group of students in a classroom would outweigh online classes in terms of boosting learning efficiency. This is mainly attributed to the fact that strict regulations and direct supervision can act as a deterrent to cheating and force students to focus on their studies. By contrast, when having online classes at home, students can do multi-tasking, such as playing games and learning simultaneously, which can distract them from acquiring insights into knowledge. Therefore, students would pay more attention to their offline lessons than online ones.
In conclusion, as for the aforementioned explanations, I concur that studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home, particularly in learning efficiency and health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-03 | lennie.butera | 56 | view |
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Human activities have negative effects on plants and animals species Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem Others believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaur dodo There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, while, as for, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54754098361 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04730419983 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55737704918 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.378269454 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.857142857 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.428290442283 0.244688304435 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158947547451 0.084324248473 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157925318994 0.0667982634062 236% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.318016159406 0.151304729494 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0990281814917 0.056905535591 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.