It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaur, dodo…) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent decades, The prevention of animal extinction has been drawing a pool of media attention since it would consume huge resources of society. However, the benefits of preserving species’ existence would be superior to the oppositions.
There are a number of reasons for protecting the existence of animal species. Firstly, As the hypothesis mentioned, the extinction of several species is the natural process. There is no evidence to justify it, for instance, the disappearance of dinosaurs was not derived from natural selection, it was inherently due to the outer space meteor hitting the earth surface generating the gigantic energy sufficiently to destroy any species catastrophically. It is clear that the extinction of animals should be attributed to human-caused activities, with the exceeding exploitation of natural resources such as deforestation and unlimited fishing resulting in significantly decreasing the animal population and inhabitation. In addition, industrialization and modernization among nations created the Greenhouse effect majorly stemmed from the CO2 emission from factories and human activities, leading to the climate change threatening to the animal living environment.
It is true to say that biodiversity would be advantageous for human beings as a whole. The existence of humans attached to the animals which have been providing food and products from the prehistoric time. Preserving and flourishing the animal population is the only way to thrive human societies, seeing that without animals, the imbalance in nature would create disaster for both humans and animals. For example, in recent years, scientific evidence has pointed out that bees are on the brink of extinction owing to the destruction of their environments from human activities while this species plays an indispensable role in natural pollination, without those, flora would be perished or even vanished.
In conclusion, the coexistence between humans and animals is enormously important. Therefore, governments associated with animal preservation organizations should be the frontiers in enacting regulations and publishing research to educate people regarding protecting animal species.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-27 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-12 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | Kien Vu | 84 | view |
- Prison is the common way in most countries to solve the problem of crime. However, a more effective solution is to provide with a better education. Agree and disagree? 11
- although more and more people read news on the internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news. Do you agree or disagree 56
- nowadays, young people admire sports stars though they often do not set a good example. Do you think this is positive or negative development. 56
- Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 92
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the south pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 8.3376753507 336% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87888198758 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29638892295 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580745341615 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.1978323129 49.4020404114 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.615384615 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7692307692 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8461538462 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239330384574 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863073540895 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409381651535 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135399633403 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595273503668 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 50.2224549098 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.12 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.