It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that it is not only impossible but also useless for a nation to provide the accessibility of tertiary education for a large percentage of young people. I completely agree with this statement for some reasons.
There are a variety of reasons why it is impossible for a country to provide all young people with access higher education. First reason is that the majority of youngsters are not able to afford tuition fees. College and university require young students to learn from experiments, purchase modern equipment with high expenditure. Therefore, children who are from remote and rural areas have tendency to drop out of college because of the incredible pressure of spending on tuitions at school. Furthermore, the widespread of university exacerbate burden on the national budget because the government must subsidise for all university of the country. As a result, the governments do not have the capability of investing in other priorities such as public healthcare systems or residential accommodation.
At the same time, I believe that it also does not seem useful for the whole country since the government take into consideration to the needs of both the youth and the economy. Firstly, graduating after tertiary education is no guarantee that students will become successful and contribute to the growth of the nation. For instance, in developing countries, a large number of student choose to attend vocational training because it gives them countless opportunities as well as job security rather than those who pursue higher education. Secondly, the accessibility of college can lead to the imbalance in the workforce that would damage the economic structure because university graduates have a little chance to choose jobs such as working in factories.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the supplying entry to tertiary education is both impossible and useless for a higher proportion of young people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | Khue | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | Khue | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Thao Phan Phuong | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-25 | Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Dung | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-12 | UYVO | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies. To what extent do you thinkconsumers are influenced by advertisements? What measures can be taken to protect them? 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers. Thus, people are losing the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport why is it not popular in many places? How to increase its popularity 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... For instance, in developing countries, a large number of student choose to attend vocational tra...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31818181818 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00215669933 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564935064935 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8005160598 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4615384615 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245517009013 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845220363861 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703257139792 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163193630692 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562711804223 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.