It is neither possible nor useful to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, the question of whether or not providing university places for students is impossible and useless has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although these opinions have many disagreements, I completely agree with these ideas.
There are a variety of reasons why providing tertiary education for almost all young students is impossible. First, since the sustainable development of a nation requires to have many investments in many key areas, such as healthcare, economy, education, supporting to build campuses may put more burden on national budgets. In fact, building more places for tertiary education is prohibitive, not to mention the cost for buying indispensable teaching equipment, which implies that providing higher education for the majority of youngsters is a difficulty for the government. Second, by letting children enter higher education, parents have to pay a large amount of money for tuition fees. This means that meager income families will struggle with a guarantee to have enough money for basic demand of living and their children's fees of schooling, cannot improve their standard of living as a result.
Moreover, having a university degree no longer has a vital role in the future of young people. First, in order to be able to make a living as soon as possible, many school-leavers opt for vocational courses which help young people can earn money without committing four years of college. This means that learners are armed with practical skills and work experience, which helps them have better job opportunities and have a better future. Second, if the majority of youngsters pursue higher education, there will be an imbalance in labour market. In fact, many prosperous countries, such as Canada and Japan have continuously imported foreign workers to fill the hole of manual labor in their country, implying that vocational courses should not be marginalized.
In conclusion, although having access to tertiary education is important, it is impossible and useless at present. By considering all the pros and cons, the government and young people will make the best decision.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-13 | ThuyVyNguyen | 84 | view |
| 2020-06-24 | Tranmy | 84 | view |
- It is neither possible nor useful to provide university places for a high proportion of young people To what extend do you agree or disagree 84
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is it the case Is it a positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
Nowadays, the question of whether or not providing university places for ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, moreover, second, so, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35714285714 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89770317208 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580357142857 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5396095981 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.571428571 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137195839713 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501182718273 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049634246752 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0868477793134 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317534424871 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.