Nowadays, some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees. Why is it the case? Is it a positive or negative development?
In these days, the question of whether or not academic formal qualifications are more crucial than hands-on experience or personal qualities has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although this idea can be attributed to a whole host of reasons, some drawbacks of this development will be far more considered.
There are a variety of reasons why recruiters favor formal qualifications over life experience or personalities. First, recruiters believe that candidates with an academic qualification are equipped with in-depth knowledge and useful skills which are necessary for their future jobs. In fact, university students are armed with specialist knowledge and skills related to their majors, which helps hem make greater contributions to their company than those without any qualifications. Second, this trend is a great way to save time for employee recruiters. In fact, candidates who do not have any academic formal qualifications are more likely to spend a large amount of time and effort on mastering their job, as a result reducing work productivity.
Nevertheless, this trend has many adverse effects. First, since spending most of the time on studying and not focusing on hands-on experience, those workers may have difficulty in solving practical circumstances. In fact, many employees who have various degrees still can not deal with their clients because of a lack of vital skills and experience, losing the company's loyal customers as a result. Second, since work abilities are a string of good qualifications and good personalities and skills, employers would not marginalize any aspects. For example, a worker with a formal qualification and soft-skills such as problem-solving, leadership, interpersonal, etc will work much more effectively than a candidate with only a degree, which implies that other elements are also crucial for a good worker.
In conclusion, although favoring academic formal qualifications is attributed to some reasons, recruiters should consider candidates' life experience and personal abilities to get suitable workers and enhance work productivity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-11 | trần ngọc tuấn | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-27 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Afdalah Harris | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-02 | anhminhbnvn1 | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-09 | linhdung01 | 50 | view |
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is it the case Is it a positive or negative development 73
- It is neither possible nor useful to provide university places for a high proportion of young people To what extend do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
In these days, the question of whether or not academic formal qualifications a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, still, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.615625 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24232115688 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0929896525 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.230769231 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6153846154 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235527747273 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849329079228 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676945885857 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157527911028 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373108576772 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.