It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole What are advantages and disadvantages of this development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge

Thanks to technological advances, individuals can approach remote natural areas, including the South Pole. However, in my opinion, this development offers more demerits than merits.
To begin with, the development of technologies allows people to travel to almost all natural areas across the globe in which locals encounter insufficient accommodations and other amenities, leading to metabolic illnesses, such as malaria. By offering humanitarian assistance, the risks of these illnesses might be decreased gradually in mountainous areas. Besides, the investigations enable scientists to untangle numerous mysterious phenomenons revolving around either science or extinct animals. As a result, remote natural environments could home unhidden secrets that help people to have a deeper understanding of the Earth.
However, I believe that the disadvantages of traveling to remote areas outweigh the advantages mentioned above. Firstly, the appearance of human beings in these places has detrimental effects on creatures. This happens because the increasing numbers of the population contribute to the deaths of marine and terrestrial animals. Therefore, the presence of citizens could offer a further decrease in the number of animals in remote areas. Secondly, due to the increasing demands’ tourists, tourism companies can build resorts and other constructions serving tourists, leading to the destruction of the environment.
In conclusion, I reaffirm that although the investigation of remote natural environments offers some advantages, the disadvantages of this development outweigh the advantages completely.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 13.1623246493 8% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 228.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.10526315789 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28244863896 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.640350877193 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1616349335 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4166666667 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179737514123 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616394651041 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585613454249 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122542977655 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446642087717 0.056905535591 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.16 12.4159519038 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.09 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.