It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
It is a common belief that traveling to remote areas has brought about numerous advantages for scientists and tourists. However, there is a more persuasive argument that the disadvantages of this outweigh the benefits because of negative impact on the natural environment and potential risks as well.
On the one hand, while traditional traveling activities, such as going to cities or other countries, is increasingly similar to everyone, it is more exciting for people to try out new one - visiting to isolated natural areas. There is no denying that they might get the joy of new experience when they have first-foot in strange and secret places. For instance, instead of seeing Amazon forest from mass media, tourists now may be able to explore its gorgeous beauty and get to explore striking scenery by their own eyes thank to this type of new tourism. In addition, remote areas, located away from human habitat, is still a big questionable land for people to make expedition. Therefore, when visiting remote areas, people, especially scientists might acquire more unknown knowledge, such as wild animal’s lifestyle. They can learn about the life of Polar bear, for example, when coming to the South Sole.
Nevertheless, while traveling to remote natural areas is advantageous in a few aspects, the disadvantages of this is more significant. In the first place, it has hidden risks that directly influence on people's health. In fact, it is very common that people who suddenly get unexpected accidents to find, need to be cured in time. Taking the example of traveling to wild forests, travelers are more likely to be attacked by dangerous animals. However, having a proper treatment at these places is not as easy as somewhere nearby where human living that caused negative problems on their health, even put their live in some emergency situations. On the top of that, since traveling to isolated areas has developed, it has overall detrimental effects on natural environment. South Sole, for instance, human encroachment threatens the wild animal's habitat as well as tending to make pollution.
In conclusion, while there are some benefits to visiting remote natural areas, it is evident that there are far more drawbacks to trying this type of tourism.
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country What are the reasons Solutions to change negative attitudes 84
- The below compared 2 floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010 61
- The diagrams show changes in a student common room 78
- There are several factors that motivate people to stay in the workforce and money is the most important reason factor To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The chart shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of air pollutants in 4 cities 2000 Summarise the information and Write at least 150 words 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 911, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...example, when coming to the South Sole. Nevertheless, while traveling to remote ...
^^^
Line 3, column 837, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
..., human encroachment threatens the wild animals habitat as well as tending to make poll...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14092140921 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78434657129 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558265582656 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0285247572 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5625 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0625 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0625 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279325279402 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850167249553 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708083225886 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176248707267 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712321246671 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.