It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
In recent years, more and more people have been able to visit distant natural places for researching and exploring. While this trend is advantageous in a few aspects, the disadvantages are more significant
there are some benefits of traveling and researching in remote locations. Firstly, these isolated natural places play a significant4 role in researching world climate. For example, in the South Pole, researchers could take a measure of the rising sea-level when the ice melted due to the increasing global temperatures. As the result, these findings help in predicting future climate change and providing information for policymakers. Secondly, in terms of tourism, visitors have opportunities to explore new creatures and natural occurrences that they have never experienced before. Furthermore, adventures to distant natural environment will also raise people’s awareness of preserving their surroundings.
However, the drawbacks of the increasing number of visitors to these places are significant, outweighing the benefits. An important factor is that human activities may cause devasting effects on the environment. For example, there will be significant environmental pollution stemming from the disposal of litter from ships. Such activities also may harm the natural habitats of animals. Consequently, these animals do not find a place to live and eventually may be on the verge of extinction. Another reason is that people may face difficulties in securing accommodation and food when traveling to uninhabited places. In addition to this, people may catch strange diseases which are caused by unknown bacteria.
In summary, researching and exploring distant locations are associated with many shortcomings which far outweigh the benefits. For these reasons, it is recommended that traveling to distant natural environment be restricted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., the disadvantages are more significant there are some benefits of traveling and...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...advantages are more significant there are some benefits of traveling and rese...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in addition, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85401459854 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21498668407 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609489051095 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.7669846897 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.25 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21108611962 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619477854232 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501801807443 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122597893499 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209669387758 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.35 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.