It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
In this day and age, the issue of humans' visits to remote natural areas like the South Pole has drawn much attention from the people of concern. From my perspective, I am of the opinion that the benefits of such development outweigh several demerits that it brings about.
On the one hand, it is believed that scientists' and tourists' exploration of unspoiled natural environments may be conducive to some hard-solving problems. First of all, human activities are risky for the natural habitats of animals as well as the environment in such places. In particular, some people might pose a serious threat to the surroundings due to their unintentional actions such as littering and eradicating some plants, and even intentional actions like killing animals for food and scientific purposes. Moreover, not only is travel to remote natural areas risky for the place but it may also be relatively detrimental to visitors if they are not well-prepared enough. For example, the temperature at the South Pole is usually very low, which requires people to ensure their safety in order not to be adversely affected.
On the other hand, there are multifarious benefits of undertaking expeditions in isolated places in terms of both recreation and science. Firstly, it is the untouched beauty of these areas that are considered to be appealing and novel to travelers as it offers visitors breathtaking scenery and unforgettable memories in these places for their holidays. Secondly, environmental scientists can enormously benefit from undiscovered secrets about natural animals and habitats for their studies. For instance, they can analyze the data about the species under ice layers over millions of years to discover new animals as well as predict the possible pandemics of these classes, which is considered to be crucial for governments to allocate plans for such problems.
In conclusion, for all mentioned above, it seems to me that the possible benefits of traveling to wild environments are more significant as compared to its potential dangers.
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors agriculture manufacturing and business and financial services to the Uk economy in the twentieth century Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wh 73
- The graph below gives information about fossil fuel energy demand and availability in the country of Freedonia from 1980 to 2060 projected Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27828746177 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9851387118 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559633027523 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.2575193261 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.833333333 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.25 7.06120827912 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292246370632 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999880464937 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453847431207 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166531723594 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414885662008 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27828746177 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9851387118 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559633027523 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.2575193261 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.833333333 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.25 7.06120827912 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292246370632 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999880464937 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453847431207 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166531723594 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414885662008 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.