It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as South pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, scientists and travelers can go to remote natural environments easily. Personally, I believe the positive effects outweigh the negative and this essay will provide suitable explains with examples.
First of all, there are some advantages about travel to remote natural environments. It is true that these environments do not be damaged by human activities, therefore they attract lots of people who want to see and discover. As a result, governments can use these locations as travel areas and the money, which is from the tourist spend will be used to improve then upgrade the infrastructure for protecting these spaces. For example, in Vietnam, there are a lot of national parks, which people can spend money going there to witness many rare species both animals and plants. This not only preserves these precious species but also helps governments gain financial budgets so they can improve better conditions for these parks. Secondly, there are many mysteries in remote areas, which are creating opportunities for scientists to research and discover. For instance, many nations send scientists to the North pole to research bacterias, which are under the deep ice so they might prevent a pandemic disease in the future.
On the other hand, there are still some drawbacks when people go to remote places. The first negative impact is that some people still do illegal actions, which can cause heavy damage to these environments. Many thieves who chop rare trees illegally then sell them to black markets with high prices. This makes the number of these trees decrease dramatically and if governments do not have solutions, these trees will be gone forever and never be restored. The second disadvantage is when people arrive to new areas, which have never been landed, they will start harming the ecological by human's activities. For example, numerous people still throw garbages everywhere into the environment, which affects on the soil and is very dangerous for animals when they ate these rubbishes.
In conclusion, I believe that when tourists and scientists travel to remote areas still outweigh these drawbacks since it brings benefits to humanity.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1824.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24137931034 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67196881724 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543103448276 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9298449009 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.375 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216657262409 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811074642153 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665108125983 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158680234057 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526970341836 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.