The bar chart shows type of media to get daily news, by age group 2011
The pie chart illustrates the percentage of three types of media to get daily news which were used by different ages in 2011.
Overall, the proportion of social networking and radio which were used by ages higher percentage than microblogging.
First of all, the proportion of social networking took the highest of 80% in 2011 at the age of 10-17 and 18-29. Secondly, this figure was about half for people who were 30-49 and followed by 40% in the age 50-64 and lower than 30% for people above 65 in the same year. Thirdly, more and less 90% of using radio for reading news were people from 18 to 65 or higher. On other hand the percentage for those who just about 10-17 used radio, which was made up 40% at the same year
By contrast, the percentage of reading news by microblogging in all the age was very low. Only people were 18-29 who used the microblogging the most, which was about higher than 20% while others were under 20% in 2011.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view |
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road might cause some problems What are the problems What could be done to solve those problems 61
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 89
- Sending criminals to prison is not the effective method to deal with them Education and job training should be used instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- A few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries while the usage of others is rapidly declining Is this a positive or a negative development 73
- the chart show that time spent on two devices according to various categories Describe the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...ess 90% of using radio for reading news were people from 18 to 65 or higher. On othe...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 772.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.46242774566 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36587837116 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520231213873 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5476103389 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.285714286 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16940003385 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103588620033 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138239754166 0.0843802449381 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155776255976 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.16425689454 0.0819641961636 200% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.