It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. What are advantages and disadvantages of this development?
With regard to the pace alterations in the present transport and technology era, it is though visitors and science-seekers can potentially journey to far beyond natural places having been already discovered, such as Antarctica. Clearly, notwithstanding some minor cons, there are more blinding pros.
There might be some disadvantages to paying a visit to such areas. Some argue these parts of the world could be placed in jeopardy due to reaching these lands, individuals throw garbage away and contaminate air with vehicles through which they use to commute, so much so that they would find these undiscovered areas as a cash cow, playing a part in occupying and spoiling these far environments. The construction of facilities, including airports, hotels, and motels, is a case in point. For this reason, some hold this mindset that these probable drawbacks might be inescapable.
The advantages of visiting unspoiled parts of the earth are perceived significant, delivering a multitude of benefits for both tourists and those who seize the scientific opportunities. By travelling to such eye-opener places, these science guys can feasibly discover new plant and animal species, contributing to broadening mankind’s knowledge and keeping the wheels of science turning. Situated in the picturesque environment, these must-see areas can enjoy tourism industry which sees an open way to expand in an unorthodox way, providing more and more job opportunities. Consequently, it becomes the best of both worlds of which huge profits can be made out. Advocates of this point of view, therefore, claim that some possible cons pale in comparison with pros it will bring.
In conclusion, much as there might be some drawbacks, the merits can take a great role to play in offering a wave of benefits. Indeed, the truth is that under no circumstances can we turn a blind eye to the fact that these advantages are the linchpin of any success and advancement the majority of such passengers can achieve. It is wished the indication of these pros would be in the heart of any action taken towards extending trips to far distant areas as well as fostering citizens to visit these parts of the globe.
- Some people feel that entertainers such as film stars, pop musicians or sports stars are paid too much money. Do you agree or disagree? Which other types of job should be highly paid? 89
- Students from disadvantaged families and rural areas are finding it difficult to get a university education. Some people believe that universities should help them. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- It is expected in the near future that there will be a higher proportion of old people compared to younger population in some countries. Is it a positive or negative development? Give your opinion and examples. 73
- Some people believe that for a hobby to be enjoyable it should be hard to learn or acquire. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- some people think that schools should involve students in school management. Do you agree or disagree with this idea? Give reasons for your answer. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...te air with vehicles through which they use to commute, so much so that they would ...
^^^
Line 5, column 516, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an unorthodox way" with adverb for "unorthodox"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...dustry which sees an open way to expand in an unorthodox way, providing more and more job opportunit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18539325843 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01513247812 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595505617978 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.397147311 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.857142857 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105207109815 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387170803066 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393611738614 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0599584014569 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279584528126 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.