It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole.
In recent decades, the trend of travelling in far-flung areas, such as South Pole for a variety of people has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although this is not without disadvantages, its benefits still justify.
There are many advantages of exploring remote areas that should be taken into account. First, when thrill seekers set their footsteps on these sites, they can gain more new experiences. In fact, this is a once-in-lifetime journey for them to capture breathtaking views of imposing ranges of mountains, meet new friends who are like-minded, thereby getting more excitement. Second, it is considered as one of the golden opportunity for scientists to discover the nature world and contribute to new innovations of human beings. For instance, these trips are conducive to their researches about wild animals or the structure of the earth, which benefits for important current studies about new genes or geographical structure of globe.
On the other hand, there are many reasons why they should not take part in these vigorous trips. First, since these adventures is to explore absolutely new lands, which can put them in jeopardy. It means they can face with harsh weather conditions or unexpected temperature changes, which leaves them at stake or fatal situations. Second, in order to reach these areas, it requires much effort, loads of money. In fact, it is necessary to invest the huge amount of money in equipment with a support of experienced scientists, however, it can come at the expense without valuable results, thus wasting money and labour force.
In conclusion, exploration of remote regions provides a whole host of upsides for scientists and travellers. By weighing up all pros and cons carefully, they can have their own decision that helps to develop our society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-26 | Garrett | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | neethujithin | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | neethujithin | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | myra124 | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Jonkun | 73 | view |
- The chart below gives information about the UK s ageing population in 1985 and makes predictions for 2035 47
- The charts shows air pollution levels by different causes among four countries in 2012 82
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. 73
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car. 73
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and cultures. Others think it's not necessary. Discuss both views. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, still, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19727891156 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83851230622 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6577775747 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.142857143 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141491614311 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044074076015 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650478882768 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910430795817 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592933607159 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.