The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different
seasons. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main
features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart provided compares the points of three teams, Team A, team B, team C in the course of 4 years, from 2002 to 2005.
Overall, Team B topped the list during the survey period while team A and team C had lower scores than those of team B in the period of 4 years.
In 2002, team A gained 5 points, which was by half team C, with 10 points. In 2004, it was noted that team A climb significantly to 35 points, team C dropped after reaching its peak at 15% in 2003. IN 2005, the points of team A were 8, which was higher than those of team C, a difference of 3 points.
A striking feature is team B. In 2002, team B became a scorer with 82 points, compared to the bottoms of team A and team C, with 5 points and 10 points, respectively. In 2004, team B lost its momentum and reached the bottom position with 43 points. It is obvious that team B showed a gather pace and made a recovery with 56 points at the end of the survey.
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four differentseasons. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the mainfeatures and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graphs below show the post-school qualifications held by Australians in the age groups 25 to 34 and 55 to 69. 84
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 73
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four differentseasons. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the mainfeatures and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 757.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.00529100529 4.92477711251 81% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24410989626 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502645502646 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 192.6 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.0 1.45097560976 69% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1141873387 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1111111111 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154317812597 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850026335119 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357547941465 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120527143261 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288166969654 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 100.92 61.2550243902 165% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.4 10.3012195122 43% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 5.98 11.4140731707 52% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.