It's generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for music and sport, and others are not. However, it's sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.
Discuss both ideas by giving your opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Irrefutably, there is an argument that some individuals distinctly acquire natural aptitude such as inborn talent for sport or music. In contrast, some critics propose that it is possible to access proficiency in those aspects through learning as well as practice. As far as I am concerned, I gravitate towards to the latter opinion that the key factor to talent is consistent efforts.
It cannot be denied that there is an entwined relation between genetic inheritance and distinct ability. For instance, a child has tendency to expose prominent performance in sport or music providing that either of their parents is sportsman or singer, respectively. Nevertheless, but for adequate hard-working training, the inborn talents may degrade day by day, absolutely. Although the gifted consumes less extensive practice than those who do not receive that fortune, it is not encouraged for them to take their inborn ability for granted.
On the other hand, training is capable of arising opportunity to reach expertise not only in sports or music by in other aspects. Patience and enthusiasm are two significant qualifications that lead people to success, regardless of the avoid of natural aptitude. Nowadays, a wide range of training institution is established to support as well as motivate those who desire to pursue their passions and reach the best performance, particularly in sport and music.
In conclusion, distinct talent, which is superior tool leading to successful career path, just otherwise plays a peripheral element in proficiency. Additionally, consistent efforts takes priority in thriving individuals' expertise.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-20 | Huonggiangvn204 | 73 | view |
| 2021-04-08 | sunflower.cow | 61 | view |
| 2020-09-08 | Phuoc Nguyen | 61 | view |
| 2020-07-14 | Panhhhne | 61 | view |
| 2020-03-05 | gunel muradova | 61 | view |
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 89
- Many people feel it is a waste of money to try to save endangered species for example the tiger or the blue whale To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high level of sugar which cause may health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 78
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar canes Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationship Do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 380, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y factor to talent is consistent efforts It cannot be denied that there is an ent...
^^^
Line 2, column 534, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to take their inborn ability for granted On the other hand training is capable of...
^^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...at lead people to success regardless of the avoid of natural aptitude Nowadays a wide ran...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...formance particularly in sport and music In conclusion distinct talent which is s...
^^^
Line 4, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r path just otherwise plays a peripheral element in proficiency Additionally cons...
^^
Line 4, column 205, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...tent efforts takes priority in thriving individuals expertise
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iority in thriving individuals expertise
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37848605578 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96153442992 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601593625498 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 251.0 20.2975951904 1237% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1350.0 106.682146367 1265% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 251.0 20.7667163134 1209% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 124.0 7.06120827912 1756% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206637364652 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.206637364652 0.084324248473 245% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109682178611 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566851803648 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 129.4 13.0946893788 988% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -200.21 50.2224549098 -399% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 103.5 11.3001002004 916% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.4 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 21.24 8.58950901804 247% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 9.78957915832 572% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 102.4 10.1190380762 1012% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 56.0 10.7795591182 520% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.