Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is often a dichotomy between what subjects are encouraged for university students. On the one hand, people propose that students had better pursue their interests, opting for subjects sorted according to their passion. Other critics, on the other hand, believe it is viable for students to study useful fields, science as well as technology in particular. As far as I am concerned, no matter what students choose to access, those aspects should constitute an efficient means of earning for living.
Passion is a gorgeous catalyst that promotes studying strongly, which results in a good performance. In other words, no matter how challenging the tasks are, students seem to deal with them enthusiastically. They are able to accomplish the tasks without any restrictions from external effects such as their lectures as well as their parents. Moreover, time consumption decreases considerably because this catalyst named passion is capable of promoting the speed of acquiring assignments. As a result, students not only save their time but also reach the highest performance in their subjects.
In contrast, following realistic subjects is favorable for students in the future, some critics say. It cannot be denied that the development of science and technology has been widespread still. Students can take advantage of those subjects, not only an immense range of employment vacancies in the job market but also earning income. A transparent illustration that nowadays people saw the constantly increasing applications of information technology. The Human race is in the fourth industrial revolution, also called industry 4.0 when smart technology applies in various fields such as manufacture, production, even education. Technology-related subjects, in turn, are excellent options for students’ careers.
In my opinion, it is essential for students to have a cognitive comment about their choice of subjects. It means that they can follow their passion as long as it can help in earning for living. In fact, those subjects provide primitive living conditions at least because money is a basic demand of people.
In conclusion, being allowed to pursuing own interests is always pleasant for students. However, reality should be taken into account when students opt for subjects. If their passion does not provide any useful application, their life, along with their interest, will degrade due to the devoid of money.
- It s generally believed that some people are born with certain talents for instance for music and sport and others are not However it s sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician Discuss both ideas by giving 61
- Many people feel it is a waste of money to try to save endangered species for example the tiger or the blue whale To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- Some people say that a country will benefit greatly if its students study abroad To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of people accessing news via media in one country in 2013 2015 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevent 78
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are the reasons What could be done 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, thus, well, at least, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, in particular, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2055.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45092838196 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97919198039 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596816976127 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.2668300032 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.8571428571 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9523809524 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231435816756 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655582559989 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453499286566 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1216850502 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448156994484 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.