It is thought that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes
It is thought that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes. Personally, I totally agree with this statement because doing this service help children become more confident and also create opportunities for them to discover their successful in the future.
On the one hand, volunteering is a great opportunity to acquire valuable work experience. It is easy to have a job because they can mention these in their resume when it is time to apply for a job. The teenagers who have done some kind of community work are more chance to get job than someone who has no experience of volunteering. In addition, doing charity work help children to increase their social skills such as: communicate skills, leadership skills …and have more opportunities to develop your future personal. Furthermore, it also helps children to reduce stress and boost happiness when they help the needy.
On the other hand, serving their communities helps children find their targets in life. The majority of children do not know why they have to go to school every day to learn subjects that they do not even like. However, volunteering gives their opportunities to discover meaningful things that cannot be found in academic classes. For example, by helping a local nonprofit distribute food to the poor, some children may sympathize with them and want to grow up to become people who can solve this problem. Once they have this goal in their mind, they would even become passionate about the school subjects that can help them achieve it.
In conclusion, by taking part in unpaid community service, children can increase self-confidence and also find things they want to do. Therefore, this service should be compulsory for them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15625 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75908423468 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548611111111 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.499734958 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.071428571 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197747587626 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104100371515 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.214650833878 0.0667982634062 321% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186236468247 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.157247207794 0.056905535591 276% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.