It is true that people who have a reference for reading rather than watching TV usually have more lively imaginations and sharped language skill. While many people oppose to this idea, I strongly agree with this view.
On the one hand, I advocate that reading is more beneficial than watching videos in terms of boosting the creativity and expanding the vocabularies. Firstly, when reading, people are forced to imagine everything by themselves. This would stimulate people's brains because they have to visualize the characters and plot of the stories. Regarding language skills, being engrossed into books could help teenagers expend their vocabularies through strange and beautiful words written in those books. Besides, students could learn different grammatical structures and then apply them to their writing styles.
On the other hand, I would argue that watching TV is a less effective way in improving creativity and sharpening language skill. While seeing ready-made images on screens, people tend to use their imagination very little. Furthermore, dialogue of the movie is usually spoken at a fast speed which means people do not have much chance to absorb the information the directors want to convey. Finally, television is full of advertisements these days which could distract viewers from comprehending the main story. This makes it even more difficult for people to enhance language skills and strengthen their imagination.
In conclusion, while a number of people enjoys watching TV more than reading books, I personally believe that people who read books for enjoyment would develop their creativity better and learn new vocabularies more productive.
It is true that people who have a reference for reading rather than watching TV usually have more lively imaginations and sharped language skill. While many people oppose to this idea, I strongly agree with this view.
On the one hand, I advocate that reading is more beneficial than watching videos in terms of boosting the creativity and expanding the vocabularies. Firstly, when reading, people are forced to imagine everything by themselves. This would stimulate people's brains because they have to visualize the characters and plot of the stories. Regarding language skills, being engrossed into books could help teenagers expend their vocabularies through strange and beautiful words written in those books. Besides, students could learn different grammatical structures and then apply them to their writing styles.
On the other hand, I would argue that watching TV is a less effective way in improving creativity and sharpening language skill. While seeing ready-made images on screens, people tend to use their imagination very little. Furthermore, dialogue of the movie is usually spoken at a fast speed which means people do not have much chance to absorb the information the directors want to convey. Finally, television is full of advertisements these days which could distract viewers from comprehending the main story. This makes it even more difficult for people to enhance language skills and strengthen their imagination.
In conclusion, while a number of people enjoys watching TV more than reading books, I personally believe that people who read books for enjoyment would develop their creativity better and learn new vocabularies more productive.
- It is believed that pleasure reading is a better way to improve imagination and linguistic skills than watching TV I agree with this idea for some reasons Of course reading for pleasure brings benefits to the readers As a language teacher I have seen stud 61
- It is said that the majority of television programmes had better concentrate on educating the young generation about the essential of social aspects While I partly agree with this idea other issues such as advertisement or entertainment cannot overlooked 89
- It is true that each country need to have rules and laws that all citizens must comply Some people argue that residents should be allowed to be free to do whatever they want I strongly believe that legislation is essential to ensure social safety To begin 89
- People have different views about factors leading to people s achievements While I agree that material wealth and physical appearance are essential I believe that diligence and persistence are more significant On the one hand it is no doubt true that mone 89
- The idea that nowadays new staff in a particular company licking fundamental interpersonal skills are widespread There are several possible reasons behind this phenomenon and steps need to be taken to tackle these problems There are two primary reasons wh 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, regarding, so, then, while, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4555984556 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79379315334 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625482625483 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8465160059 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.692307692 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.577432801848 0.244688304435 236% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184036066134 0.084324248473 218% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.18572659793 0.0667982634062 278% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.403913140612 0.151304729494 267% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.298610114485 0.056905535591 525% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.