It will be better for both society and individuals is driverless cars - cars can drive themselves- become more widely used. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Since technology has shown great improvements in an unprecedented level, automobile cars have no longer been an unattainable dream. Many people then advocate that the use of those cars stands every citizen and the society as a whole in good stead holistically. From my point of view, I am of the opinion that driverless cars bring a myriad of advantages for both social and civil use.
The first thing to notice is that the utility of autonomous cars offers more convenience and accessibility to people. Undoubtedly, when drivers travel in an autonomous car, robotic systems will be responsible for directions, checking the surroundings and the like. As a result, users can make use of that spare time to watch movies, finish their work or simply relax. Moreover, self-driving cars can cater to the needs of the elderly or disabled people, who are limited to the use of cars. As cars are now autofunctioned, they can commute without any difficulties, thus promoting better travelling experience to all strata of the society.
Furthermore, when it comes to societal scale, the use of driverless cars can mitigate traffic accidents. While some claim that those cars pose more severe risks to people as they have no control of their driving, I believe that that fear is unjustifiable. Being equipped with state-of-the-art technology and effective sensing systems, autonomous cars can seek best routes, avoid other vehicles around and speculate the collisions. According to McKinsey, an automobile corporation, it is speculated that by 2050, when all citizens apply the use of self-driving cars, 90% of accidents on streets will have been impeded. Thus, driving fatalities will be alleviated and the safety of the society can be underpinned.
In conclusion, I am convinced that people benefit greatly from the application of autofunction cars, both socially and individually, including better driving experience, convenience, higher accessibility and safety.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, thus, while, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36245954693 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1442756812 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608414239482 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1828576349 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.357142857 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339644237415 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115013389359 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487870139001 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188865786829 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720162583768 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.