Knowing how to make a group presentation is the most important task for anyone in the world of work today.
How important are presentation and public speaking skills, compared with various other work skills?
Which skill is the most important ability for most people these days?
The modern workplace requires working adults to have a range of skills, among which the ability to deliver a group presentation is suggested to be the most vital. While of value, the presentation and public speaking skills are only a tertiary skill set and less significant than personal and team management, which will be proved in the following essay.
Regarding the role of presentation skills, people highlight their facilitation to effective work-related communication. For instance, in meetings, employees are often requested to report work progress or present ideas for projects. An engaging delivery and attractive visuals allow presenters to convey ideas clearly and leave a good impression.
However, it is also true that presentation skills are becoming less needed. For instance, in the field of medicines, seminars happen less frequently due to their time-consuming nature while finance companies rarely require leaders to address large groups of workers.
Also, the significance of presentation skills seems pale in comparison to that of management techniques, which are applied on various levels. The most essential is likely the ability to manage personal workloads is key to elevating work performance. For instance, capable workers can often prioritize their work duties, troubleshoot problems, and find ways to remove them, ensuring their progress as a result. While slightly less significant, the capacity to manage a team is still imperative to collaborative projects. This is best exemplified by how team managers can set and monitor team objectives and regulate the workflow. Success in managing groups most often ensures professional development.
In brief, it is in my conviction that while the presentation and public speaking skills should not be neglected, they are far less crucial than the ability to manage individual professional responsibilities and coordinate team members.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-15 | vevinawynn | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-23 | Quân Lê 2020 | 61 | view |
| 2021-06-23 | Quân Lê 2020 | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-23 | Quân Lê 2020 | 61 | view |
| 2021-06-16 | Quân Lê 2020 | 89 | view |
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots Is this a negative or positive development 89
- Many people today are worried about the large quantities of waste produced by ordinary households What problems are caused by household waste What solutions may be possible in both the short and the long term 89
- People who do not use social media networks will always fall behind in career development opportunities To what extent do you feel that this is an accurate and important prediction 89
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, regarding, so, still, while, as for, for instance, in brief, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66666666667 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14048631918 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586805555556 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1916553612 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.571428571 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304351462634 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10250734073 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572452061831 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163989079558 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546642878044 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.