Language teacher should concentrate only on giving positive feedback when students do good work rather than on criticizing their bad work.
Generally, people are motivated by language teachers should concentrate on analysis positive feedback to their students when they do superb work, rather than on criticizing disappoint work. Some people might believe that teachers must give positive feedback to students when they do well work, while others might criticizing bad work it is a good way for children. However, in my opinion, I partly agree with these two topics because all of student need superb advise when they do a great thing and always need to recommend what is wrong with their work.
On the one hand, people may think that teachers must give positive feedback to students when they do well work. As language teachers give advice and compliments when students work brilliant, will make students require more language homework and the work will come out more efficiently. For example, Mira sent homework to a teacher by email and teacher reply back to Mira “ This is fantastic work and well language Mira, this is your first time I do not want to believe that. I never saw work like this before I hope next time your work will be better and better keep fighting” that made Mira feel so proud of herself and every work of Mira her language is better than the first time.
On the other hand, people may think that it is not necessary that language teachers giving appreciate feedback but teachers should give criticizing bad work. In the opinion of teachers when they give analysis on bad work, one of the most important things is they want students to improve their work and their language because language is so important in their life. For instant, my brother had an imperfect score in English subject and teacher told him about his fault and how to improve his score. When my brother had an examination again, my brother got a high score more than last time and his language development too.
To summarise, it is hard to make all people view things in the same way, in real life language so significantly and these two feedback really necessary with all of the student. However, to me, I still partly agree that language teachers should give analysis when students do fantastic work and criticizing bad work, especially for students to develop their work. The examples and cases mentioned above have supported my point of view to the best.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-11 | Cosmic power | 67 | view |
- Language teacher should concentrate only on giving positive feedback when students do good work rather than on criticizing their bad work 67
- Do children behave better when they are physically punished or rewarded 84
- Universities should provide students with the skills they will require in order to succeed at their future jobs How far do you agree or disagree with the above opinion What are some of the job skills that employers look for in new employees 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 695, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...language is better than the first time. On the other hand, people may think that...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 158, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...hese two feedback really necessary with all of the student. However, to me, I still partly...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, really, so, still, well, while, for example, in my opinion, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 46.0 24.0651302605 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 400.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8275 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44059290952 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4375 0.561755894193 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.0571125675 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.928571429 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5714285714 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.5934730533 0.244688304435 243% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.243314095099 0.084324248473 289% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181883292343 0.0667982634062 272% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.402729830029 0.151304729494 266% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0928687398421 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.58950901804 81% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.