Large companies use sports events to promote their products. Some people think it has a negative impact on sports. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is no denying that sport is one of the most vivid fields and receives much attention from society. In light of this, large companies started to realize the benefits that can be reaped from promoting their products via sports events has become a topic of general interest among citizens. Although some people believe this phenomenon might have a pessimistic influence on sports, I would argue that allowing organizations to advertise in sports events would have benefits.
Some people give a reason why large companies harm sports once they promote their products in such events. An advocate of this opinion is that this might affect sportsmanship. This is because the audience can be distracted by advertisements hanging around the stadium. In addition, instead of marketing for the event, the media now focus on those products. However, companies need to discuss with the organizing committee to get a deal on how those advertisements will be arranged appropriately to not disturb the competition.
In my opinion, the promoted products will not only cause any trouble to sports but also aid the competition with rich sponsors. In terms of implementing media work, companies are required to offer the organizing committee a specific amount of money as the fee to run advertisements. Therefore, the organization will have a greater expense to invest in the event, hence improving the competition’s quality. To illustrate, the World Cup was invited to accept branches with the amount of sponsored money being hundreds of millions of dollars. Thus, they had an abundance of money to organize the competition to the fullest, as well as having sources to ensure players experience the best conditions.
In conclusion, many people concern that allowing large companies to lay their advertisements in sports events would harm sports, but with wise discussion from the organization committee, this can benefit the event in vice versa as they can be supported with a considerable amount of sponsored money for organizing.
- Although there is a lot of translation software available learning a language still could be advantageous To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period 78
- Today children and teenagers are committing more crimes Why is this case How should they be punished 73
- Fewer young people choose to work in farming What are the reasons Should young people be encouraged to do farming work 67
- The diagram shows a process of making a storage area from a material called concrete canvas 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29102167183 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00473607507 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569659442724 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9865083156 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.071428571 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230309952665 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808042072607 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939045510838 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157980688285 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596769366895 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.