Leaders and directors in organizations are often older people. Some people say that younger people could be leaders. Do you agree or disagree?
Throughout history, it is commonly thought that the elderly should be orienting and leading people in most of their business. However, in recent times, in industrialization and modernization, many people strongly believe that the younger age groups can be leaders and managers in organizations both private and public corporations. I support the point that young people should be prioritized in the competitions of selecting a chief executive officer.
On the one hand, there are several reasons for choosing elderly people to a position of leaders. Firstly, due to managerial faculty being accumulated from different related fields in their working life, the elderly leaders can orient and guide their teams and their employees when being faced with serious office problems or difficulties such as dropping in crisis or standing on the edge of bankruptcy. Secondly, the leaders in their sixties tend to be more calm and thoughtful before giving a significant decision or only simply confronting common office troubles. To be precise, the sensible and wise ways they offer stems from their skills and experience being collected in a long-term period connecting with hard-working life.
On the other hand, despite a lack of skills and experience, the benefits from younger leaders are much greater than the downside ones. Having said that, Young superiors are likely to update their capability of access to the internet and virtual offices in adapting to the digital era, which the elderly ones tend to be unable to keep up with. To be more specific, thanks to social media or social streaming, several companies can figure out tons of essential opportunities, like advertising products they save through the official website, which can be missed out by the elderly conservative and outdated. Furthermore, because of their youth, they might be more creative, energetic, and motivated to try to achieve potential goals, resulting in helping companies grow up constantly and restricting decreased productivity and motivation.
To conclude, there are some advantages that older group leaders can bring, however, the younger ones can play a vital role in contributing to a job and a company. I totally think that the young generation with their youth and energy should be given more chances and replace the older ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-20 | VanChungNguyen | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | Trần Nhã Vân | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-31 | duong0403 | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-24 | chathurika2008@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2021-05-16 | Piyush seth | 56 | view |
- a Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favour of 84
- a There is an increasing amount of advertising directed at children which encourages them to buy goods such as toys and snacks Many parents are worried that these advertisements put too much pressure on children while some advertisers claim that they prov 84
- Leaders and directors in organizations are often older people Some people say that younger people could be leaders Do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f selecting a chief executive officer. On the one hand, there are several reaso...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1954.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3242506812 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88783349537 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58310626703 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.5213650667 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.307692308 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2307692308 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215115605722 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848632977688 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549485603632 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147408349387 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750965807904 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.