ln the future, it seems it would be more difficult to live on Earth. Some people think more money should be spent researching another planet to live such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some others proposed that the Earth is now too hard living on there, that be caused to climate change and another affected by resources exploiting which is guaranteed to human beings. Meanwhile, a new suggested that we need to invest in seeking other planets, namely Mars. Standing on this point, it is firmly believed that we do not need to waste our resources on what might be devised to avoiding the negative consequence in the day to come.
It is irrefutable that the Earth is no longer able to sustain human lives with it compares to the past. Indeed, the degradation of the environment witnessed a rapid speed more than ever had, in which, many forests are cutting down where had been lived of wild animals and other creatures in nature. In addition, as the population raised, more human consumption has emerged alarm by manufacturing like gas, oil that resulted in an enormous of carbon emissions. What’s more, clean water is now being scarce in almost all of the developing countries. Nevertheless, many methods are proposed that is counteracted these matters so that the environment are completely advance how we are not going to the bleak scenarios in the future.
Concerning the spending money on finding the other planets has seemed to house for humanity which is not an effective measure. In fact, there are many obstacles in detecting on other planet’s survival, how we could have certainty that we will be the ability to living on Mars. On the other hand, we could not be saying anything in advance, however, many people are suffering from poverty, diseases, and homelessness, it would be worth more attention to those who need aid from the government or wealthy people.
In conclusion, although global warming is considered into making the Earth uninhabitable, whereas, the investigation of outer planets should not be in coping with issues which are existing nowadays. It will be valuable to expenses in a way to protecting our environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-19 | TranMinhDuc | 84 | view |
- Some people think international car free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution Others think that there are some other ways Discuss both view and give your own opinions 61
- Schools should stop using books for teaching children as they find them boring and use film TV and computer instead To what extent do agree with this 84
- The first chart below shows the percentages of women and men in a country involved in some kinds of home tasks cooking cleaning pet caring and repairing the house The second chart shows the amount of time each gender spent on each task per day Summarize t 62
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 78
- Nowadays older people who need employment have to compete with younger people What problem does this cause and what are the solutions 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 516, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ean water is now being scarce in almost all of the developing countries. Nevertheless, man...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 730, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g to the bleak scenarios in the future. Concerning the spending money on finding...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, nevertheless, so, whereas, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98784194529 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80160402895 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598784194529 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.2053055098 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.230769231 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255760678068 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820922343121 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046895865944 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144708087106 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210673592976 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.