The diagrams below show the water supply system in Australia at present and in future. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features.
The diagrams compare that the status of the water supply system in Australia in the present day and are proposed for future changes.
Overall, it can be seen that the water supply system is mainly suggesting that how to recycle water are better for the environment.
Starting with the current water supply system, as can be clearly noticed that pure water is stored in a dam before transferring into the city which can be served for households, amenities, and industrial zone. After undergoing the water usage in the city, the stormwater will be directed straight into the river, whereas, the wastewater is sent to a water treatment plant to be processed, and is then released into the river to be safe.
Nevertheless, the new plan for this system is being launched which can be favourable to the ecosystem. The storage of pure water in a dam and its uses in the city will retain. A primary modification in a way for how to send pollutants water into the river as well. Both the stormwater and wastewater are experiencing to the water treatment plant. And ultimately, these waters are straight away into the river in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-23 | khanh_uyen | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-03 | TranMinhDuc | 82 | view |
| 2021-01-07 | xuanhieu26 | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-30 | Jango Jo | 82 | view |
| 2020-10-25 | jessie_12345 | 87 | view |
- The process shows how plants create food
- The maps give information about a university sports court 78
- Young people are often influenced by peer pressure Do the disadvantages outweigh the advantages 73
- ln the future it seems it would be more difficult to live on Earth Some people think more money should be spent researching another planet to live such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The three pictures below show three different kinds of bridges Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, then, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78571428571 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69091906191 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1385967155 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.222222222 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186219839658 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957963550305 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922993524641 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169515231918 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0977593146856 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.